Source availability
Full source code available for audit and contribution
- Screenpipe
- Source available; personal use is free and commercial use requires a license
- Remio
- Not available
Product comparison · reviewed August 1, 2026
Full screen & audio capture vs web content collection. A side-by-side look at scope, data control, platform support, and extensibility—without pretending one product is best for everyone.
Same criteria
Both products are evaluated against the same feature and deployment questions.
Trade-offs included
Remio's strengths are shown alongside Screenpipe's.
No winner score
The right choice depends on the job, risk model, and operating environment.
The practical differences
Start with the criteria that can actually change your decision. Marketing category labels are less useful than concrete operating constraints.
Full source code available for audit and contribution
Remio requires M1/M2/M3 chip - no Intel Mac, Windows, or Linux
Screenpipe captures everything on screen, Remio only saves web pages
Capture meetings, calls, and voice - Remio has no audio
Capture Figma, VS Code, Slack, and any app - not just browser
Remio's extension auto-saves readable web content
Side by side
Capabilities can change. Treat this as an evaluation starting point and verify purchase-critical requirements with each vendor.
| Criterion | Screenpipe | Remio |
|---|---|---|
| Source availabilityFull source code available for audit and contribution | Source available; personal use is free and commercial use requires a license | Not available |
| Platform SupportRemio requires M1/M2/M3 chip - no Intel Mac, Windows, or Linux | Mac, Windows, Linux + iPhone & Android (Q3) | Mac only (Apple Silicon) |
| Screen RecordingScreenpipe captures everything on screen, Remio only saves web pages | 24/7 all monitors | Not available |
| Audio RecordingCapture meetings, calls, and voice - Remio has no audio | Available | Not available |
| Desktop App CaptureCapture Figma, VS Code, Slack, and any app - not just browser | Available | Not available |
| Web Content CaptureRemio's extension auto-saves readable web content | Via screen recording | Auto-capture extension |
| Local File SyncRemio syncs DOCX, PDF, and images to knowledge base | Via screen capture | Available |
| Data Storage | 100% local | Local + optional cloud |
| API AccessQuery your data programmatically - developer friendly | Available | Not available |
| Custom PluginsBuild custom automations and integrations | Available | Not available |
| AI Model ChoiceBoth support multiple AI providers | Claude, Gemini, Ollama + Apple Intelligence / Windows AI | OpenAI, Gemini, Claude (BYOK) |
| Local AI SupportRun completely offline with local models | Ollama + Apple Intelligence / Windows AI | Not available |
| Multi-MonitorCapture all screens simultaneously | Available | N/A |
Decision guide
Choose Remio if
Choose Screenpipe if
Context
Remio captures web articles you browse - that's it. Everything else is invisible: your code editor, design tools, Slack messages, native apps, PDFs you read locally. Screenpipe records your entire screen continuously, capturing every pixel across all monitors. If you can see it, Screenpipe remembers it. Different tools for different needs - but only one gives you complete memory.
Remio has no audio capture at all. Zero. That means no meeting transcriptions, no remembering what was said in calls, no voice notes. Screenpipe records all audio with automatic transcription. Ask 'what did John say in yesterday's meeting?' and get actual answers. Without audio, you're missing half the context of your work.
Remio only works on Apple Silicon Macs - M1, M2, M3 chips. Got an Intel Mac? No Remio. Windows at work? No Remio. Linux for development? No Remio. Screenpipe runs everywhere: Mac (Intel and Apple Silicon), Windows, and Linux. Your memory tool should work wherever you do.
Screenpipe is fully open-source and source-available. Remio is closed-source - you trust their claims without verification. When software captures your browsing history, documents, and personal data, transparency isn't optional. Inspect the code, contribute improvements, or fork it for your needs.
Screenpipe exposes a full API for querying your captured data. Build custom integrations, automate workflows, or create entirely new applications on top of your personal data. Remio offers no API - what you see is what you get. Power users and developers deserve programmatic access to their own data.
Be honest: Remio is good for research and reading workflows - saving articles, organizing references, building a knowledge base from web content. Screenpipe is for complete digital memory - everything you see and hear, searchable forever. If you mainly read articles, Remio might work. If you want total recall of your entire workflow, Screenpipe is the only choice.
FAQ
Disclosure: this comparison is written and maintained by Screenpipe, not an independent review publication.
Remio is an AI-powered second brain that auto-captures web content, syncs local files, and lets you chat with your knowledge base. It uses a Chrome extension and Mac app to build a searchable personal knowledge base. The overlap depends on the job you are buying for: Screenpipe focuses on continuous, searchable screen and audio context, while Remio may be a better fit for the narrower workflows described above.
Remio is a credible choice for teams that value clean web content capture, good article summarization, local file sync (pdf, docx). Those strengths should be weighed against the deployment, data-control, platform, and extensibility differences in the table.
Screenpipe is designed for continuous screen and audio capture, local-only capture and search, cross-platform deployment, and programmatic access through its local API and MCP integrations. Those advantages matter most when privacy, broad work context, or custom automation is the buying criterion.
No. Screenpipe publishes this page. We include Remio's strengths, avoid a numeric winner score, and state the criteria so readers can verify the claims that matter to them. Product capabilities change, so confirm critical details with each vendor before purchasing.
Evaluate with your own data
Install it, test the workflows that matter, and compare the result against your real requirements—not a vendor scorecard.