Screenpipe vs HeyClicky: execute now vs learn the workflow
An on-demand Mac agent vs local workflow history that can trigger repeatable automations
The Verdict
HeyClicky is strong when you know the task and want an agent to help or do it now. Press a hotkey and it can explain the current screen, draw where to click, or run an agent. Screenpipe is built for the process around that task. It keeps a local history of screens and conversations so an agent can start from the meeting, understand prior context, propose the next actions, request human approval, and work across connected tools. Choose HeyClicky for immediate Mac assistance. Choose Screenpipe when you need to own the workflow history, find what repeats, or build event-triggered automations across calls, CRM, project management, and other systems. Recording alone does not magically automate a process; it gives agents and operators the evidence needed to define, review, and improve one.
Choose based on the job, not the mascot
HeyClicky's public product and privacy pages describe a polished live assistant. The core buying question is whether you need help with the screen in front of you or an owned record of how work unfolds over time.
Official claims for the hotkey interaction, voice guidance, on-screen drawing, agents, supported platforms, pricing, and screenshot retention.
Official description of screenshots, voice, transcripts, prompts, backend proxying, third-party AI providers, analytics, storage, and deletion.
The repository describes itself as the auto-update feed and contains the appcast plus release binaries, not the application source.
I am stuck in a Mac app and want someone to show me where to click
HeyClicky: HeyClicky is purpose-built for spoken guidance and drawing directly on the current screen.
screenpipe: Screenpipe can answer from context, but live visual coaching is not its clearest advantage.
After each customer call, we need to update systems and launch the approved follow-up
HeyClicky: HeyClicky can help execute the steps when a user invokes it and supplies the task context.
screenpipe: Screenpipe can start from the call transcript and surrounding history, propose the workflow for approval, then act through connected CRM, project, and outbound tools.
We repeat the same onboarding process and want to automate the stable steps
HeyClicky: HeyClicky can execute a known onboarding task during an invoked session.
screenpipe: Screenpipe can compare how onboarding actually happens across customers, expose the repeated steps and exceptions, and supply examples for a reusable agent skill.
We want to train or ground agents on our own work data
HeyClicky: HeyClicky offers packaged agents but does not document a public raw-data API.
screenpipe: Screenpipe exposes local work memory through REST, MCP, CLI, SQL, and pipes while preserving an endpoint-first data boundary.
Your SSN, cards, and keys never leave your device.
Screenpipe trained its own PII removal that runs entirely on your machine. Social Security numbers, credit cards, passwords, and API keys are detected and scrubbed before anything is stored — and it catches more sensitive data than OpenAI's and Microsoft's privacy filters do.
Cloud-first tools upload your raw screen and audio to their servers first. Your most sensitive data lands on someone else's infrastructure before any filtering happens.
See the PII engine- Catches more than OpenAI's privacy filter
- Beats Microsoft's PII filter
- Runs locally — no per-call cost, nothing sent out
Where screenpipe is stronger
Live help for the current screen vs memory of the whole workflow
At a Glance
Different jobs, not identical products
HeyClicky focuses on the live interaction: you ask for help, it sees the current screen, and it teaches or acts. Screenpipe focuses on the history around the interaction: what led to the task, how the task was completed, what happened afterward, and which process repeats across the team. That distinction matters more than a raw feature count.
Privacy means understanding the data path
HeyClicky says it only captures the screen when you press its hotkey and never stores screenshots. Its privacy policy also says screenshot, transcript, and prompt payloads travel through its backend proxy to third-party AI providers, while basic summaries and account data are retained on its servers. Screenpipe can keep capture, transcription, indexing, and search on the device. Optional sync, cloud AI, exports, connectors, and team workflows are separate choices.
From a call to an approved business process
The practical difference appears after a meeting ends. Screenpipe can give an agent the transcript plus the surrounding work context, trigger a workflow, ask for approval in Slack or another system, and then act through APIs, MCP servers, or skills. A live assistant can still execute individual steps, but someone must invoke it and provide the task context. Screenpipe is designed for turning the recurring sequence into an operation the team can inspect and reuse.
Persistent context helps agents improve, but recording is not magic
Screenpipe gives agents a history they can search for prior decisions, repeated steps, tool configurations, and outcomes. That makes it possible to categorize work, find automation candidates, and refine skills from real examples. It does not mean every process becomes autonomous just because it was recorded. Teams still need to choose the workflow, connect the right systems, define permissions, and keep a human review step where mistakes would matter.
Where HeyClicky is the better choice
If you use a Mac and want an approachable voice assistant that can point at the interface, teach an unfamiliar tool, or take an immediate action, HeyClicky is purpose-built for that experience. Screenpipe is a better fit when persistent history, data ownership, cross-platform deployment, APIs, or process discovery matter more than animated live guidance.
HeyClicky: pros & cons
Where HeyClicky Is Strong
- Friendly voice-first experience built around a simple hotkey
- Draws directly on the screen to guide users through unfamiliar tools
- Runs on-demand agents that can complete tasks
- Only captures screen context after the user invokes it
- Free plan available with no card required
Limitations
- macOS 14.2 or newer only; Windows is still a waitlist
- Does not build a continuous record of work between hotkey sessions
- Screenshots, transcripts, and prompts are sent through HeyClicky's backend to third-party AI providers
- Basic text summaries and account data are stored on HeyClicky's servers
- No public app source code; the linked GitHub repository contains the update feed and binaries
- No public developer API or event-based workflow platform documented on the official site
Is Screenpipe a Good HeyClicky Alternative?
Yes. Screenpipe is a strong HeyClicky alternative and HeyClicky competitor for anyone who values privacy, transparency, and data ownership. Unlike HeyClicky, Screenpipe is open-source, supports local-only capture and search, and works on macOS, Windows, and Linux.
Screenpipe directly compares itself to HeyClicky on this page. The key difference: Screenpipe captures your screen and audio 24/7 while keeping core capture local-first. Optional sync, cloud AI, exports, connectors, and team workflows are scoped separately.
Ready for True Data Ownership?
Join thousands who chose open-source, local-first AI memory. Your data stays yours.